Trial reportInternational clinical psychopharmacology2026
Lumateperone monotherapy for major depressive episodes associated with bipolar disorder: efficacy and safety in a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in International clinical psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term safety and tolerability of lumateperone 42 mg in patients with bipolar disorder: results from a 6-month open-label extension study.International clinical psychopharmacology · 2026Trial
- Efficacy of Lumateperone in depression associated with bipolar II disorder: a pooled analysis of late-phase clinical trials.CNS spectrums · 2025Trial
- Lumateperone-induced mania: A case series.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lumateperone to treat bipolar depression. Patients (18-75 years) with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder experiencing a major depressive episode were randomized 1:1:1 to 6-week lumateperone 28 mg ( n = 183), lumateperone 42 mg ( n = 185), or placebo ( n = 186). Primary and key secondary endpoints were change from baseline to Day 43 in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total score and time to first sustained response (≥50% reduction from baseline in MADRS Total score), respectively. Safety assessments included adverse events, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), laboratory evaluations, and vital signs. Neither dose of lumateperone achieved significant improvement vs. placebo ( P > 0.05) in the primary endpoint (MADRS Total score, least squares mean difference vs. placebo: 28 mg, 0.9; 42 mg, -1.0) or in the key secondary endpoint (MADRS Total time to first sustained response hazard ratio vs. placebo: 28 mg, 1.00; 42 mg, 0.93), likely due to a high placebo response. Both lumateperone doses were well tolerated, with low EPS risk and minimal changes in weight, prolactin, and cardiometabolic or endocrine parameters. While study efficacy objectives were not met, both doses of lumateperone were generally safe and well tolerated in patients with bipolar depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.