Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40694062›Full record

Trial reportInternational clinical psychopharmacology2026

Lumateperone monotherapy for major depressive episodes associated with bipolar disorder: efficacy and safety in a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Christoph U Correll, Suresh Durgam, Susan G Kozauer, Hassan D Lakkis, Changzheng Chen, Kimberly E Vanover, Sharon Mates, Robert E Davis

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in International clinical psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Lumateperone-induced mania: A case series.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christoph U CorrellDepartment of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks.
Suresh DurgamIntra-cellular Therapies, a Johnson & Johnson company, Bedminster, New Jersey.
Susan G KozauerIntra-cellular Therapies, a Johnson & Johnson company, Bedminster, New Jersey.
Hassan D LakkisIntra-cellular Therapies, a Johnson & Johnson company, Bedminster, New Jersey.
Changzheng ChenIntra-cellular Therapies, a Johnson & Johnson company, Bedminster, New Jersey.
Kimberly E VanoverEngrail Therapeutics, San Diego, California, USA.
Sharon MatesIntra-cellular Therapies, a Johnson & Johnson company, Bedminster, New Jersey.
Robert E DavisIntra-cellular Therapies, a Johnson & Johnson company, Bedminster, New Jersey.

Funding

Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lumateperone to treat bipolar depression. Patients (18-75 years) with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder experiencing a major depressive episode were randomized 1:1:1 to 6-week lumateperone 28 mg ( n  = 183), lumateperone 42 mg ( n  = 185), or placebo ( n  = 186). Primary and key secondary endpoints were change from baseline to Day 43 in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total score and time to first sustained response (≥50% reduction from baseline in MADRS Total score), respectively. Safety assessments included adverse events, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), laboratory evaluations, and vital signs. Neither dose of lumateperone achieved significant improvement vs. placebo ( P > 0.05) in the primary endpoint (MADRS Total score, least squares mean difference vs. placebo: 28 mg, 0.9; 42 mg, -1.0) or in the key secondary endpoint (MADRS Total time to first sustained response hazard ratio vs. placebo: 28 mg, 1.00; 42 mg, 0.93), likely due to a high placebo response. Both lumateperone doses were well tolerated, with low EPS risk and minimal changes in weight, prolactin, and cardiometabolic or endocrine parameters. While study efficacy objectives were not met, both doses of lumateperone were generally safe and well tolerated in patients with bipolar depression.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsBipolar DisorderMajor Depressive DisorderAdolescentAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntidepressive AgentsHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Ringslumateperoneantipsychotic agentsbipolar depressionbipolar I disorderbipolar II disorderlumateperone

Identifiers

PMID40694062
PMCPMC12854375

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.