ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Multi-level factors drive use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in older women with early-stage breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Clinical Trial Awareness to Practice: Factors Associated with Intent to Omit Axillary Surgery Based on the SOUND Clinical Trial.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Reevaluating sentinel lymph node biopsy in older adults with T1 HR+/HER2- breast cancer: a SEER competing risk and nomogram study.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn 2016, the Society of Surgical Oncology and Choosing Wisely Campaign recommended against sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in women > 70 years with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive (ER/PR +) breast cancer, citing limited clinical benefit. Despite earlier evidence supporting de-implementation, SLNB rates remained high. We aimed to evaluate patient, tumor, facility, and unmeasured contextual factors associated with SLNB de-implementation using a national cohort.
methodsWe queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for women > 70 years diagnosed with early-stage ER/PR + and HER2-negative breast cancer between 2012 and 2019. A mixed effects logistic regression model assessed associations between SLNB non-utilization and patient, tumor, and facility-level characteristics. Interaction terms between year and facility breast surgery volume quartiles were included to examine trends over time. Reference Effect Measures (REM) were used to estimate the contribution of unmeasured contextual effects relative to measured covariates.
resultsAmong eligible patients, SLNB use declined from 86.7% in 2012 to 81.0% in 2019. SLNB use was significantly associated with age, insurance, urbanization, distance to facility, education, income, tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, treatment type, facility region, program type, and surgical volume. Academic programs had the highest adjusted odds of SLNB non-utilization (AOR 1.62; 95%CI: 1.29-2.02), while facilities in the South had the lowest (AOR 0.53; 95%CI: 0.45-0.63). High-volume centers de-implemented more rapidly post-2016, with 24% higher odds of SLNB non-utilization per year. REM analysis identified patient age and unmeasured contextual effects as the predominant drivers of de-implementation.
conclusionSLNB use in older women is influenced by multi-level factors, with patient age and unmeasured contextual effects driving de-implementation-though progress remain slow and limited in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.