Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40694636›Full record

ReviewHealth physics2025

Emerging Technologies in Radiation Therapy: Replacing Traditional Isotope-based Modalities.

Armin D Tavakkoli, David I Hunter, Beverly Allen, Conner S Ubert, David J Gladstone, P Jack Hoopes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Armin D TavakkoliORCID 0000-0003-4957-3072
David I HunterThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
Beverly AllenThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
Conner S UbertThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
David J GladstoneThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
P Jack Hoopes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractRadioactive isotopes have underpinned radiation medicine and research since their discovery. From early interstitial applications of radium and 137Cs to modern application of 192Ir after-loaders and 125I seeds in brachytherapy, radioisotopes remain the standard of care for several prostate, gynecologic, and head and neck malignancies. However, the continuous emission and high specific activity of sealed sources impose substantial logistical, regulatory, and security burdens. International regulatory agencies therefore advocate minimizing reliance on high-activity sources where feasible. Advances in image-guided, energy-concentrating modalities have yielded clinically mature platforms capable of delivering ablative energy with steep dose gradients and normal-tissue sparing without the need for radioactivity. This review surveys five such modalities: (1) laser interstitial thermal therapy, an MR-thermography-guided laser ablation system; (2) intraoperative radiation therapy, using low-kV x rays or electrons; (3) MRI-guided linear accelerators (MR-LINAC); (4) ultra-high dose rate "FLASH" external-beam therapy; and (5) particle therapy using protons and heavy ions. Collectively, these technologies promise non-radioactive, highly conformal treatment options that leverage diverse radiobiological mechanisms to redefine therapeutic ratios in clinical practice.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRadioisotopesRadiotherapyHumansLaser TherapyRadioisotopeshealth effectsradiation, medicalradiation therapysafety standards

Identifiers

PMID40694636
PMCPMC12637099

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.