Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40695283›Full record

ArticleNeuron2025

Opposing, multiplexed information in lateral and ventral orbitofrontal cortex guides sequential foraging decisions in rats.

Paul J Cunningham, A David Redish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Memory erasure by dopamine-gated retrospective learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul J CunninghamDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
A David RedishDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: redish@umn.edu.

Funding

Comorbidity: Substance Use Disorders and Other Psychiatric ConditionsT32DA037183 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Anna Zilverstand · 2014 to 2026
$3.2M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA037183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the heterogeneity between lateral orbital (LO) and ventral orbital (VO) aspects of the orbitofrontal cortex, neural ensembles were recorded while rats made economic decisions on a sequential foraging task. LO contained representations of reward value, and VO contained opposing representations of the opportunity costs associated with waiting out the delay to reward. The relative balance of these representations tracked decisions to approach or leave a reward during each stage of an encounter (i.e., task state) but scaled with externally and internally induced changes in reward value (reward scarcity and hunger, respectively). Representations of value in LO and opportunity costs in VO persisted throughout each stage of an encounter but were realized by distinct clusters of cells within each task state. Thus, LO and VO encoded opposing representations to guide sequential foraging decisions using a shared coding scheme that multiplexed information about value, via overall activity, with task state, via cell clusters.

Indexed as

Decision MakingFeeding BehaviorNeuronsPrefrontal CortexRewardAnimalsMaleRatsRats, Long-Evansdecision-makingforaginglateral OFCneuroeconomicsorbitofrontal cortexsubjective valuetask stateventral OFC

Identifiers

PMID40695283
PMCPMC12313183

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.