ArticleNeuron2025
Opposing, multiplexed information in lateral and ventral orbitofrontal cortex guides sequential foraging decisions in rats.
Article in Neuron, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The relationship between duration of access to intravenous oxycodone self-administration, economic demand for oxycodone, and cognition in rats.Psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- The relationship between duration of access to intravenous oxycodone self-administration, economic demand for oxycodone, and cognition in rats.Research square · 2026Article
- Memory erasure by dopamine-gated retrospective learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the heterogeneity between lateral orbital (LO) and ventral orbital (VO) aspects of the orbitofrontal cortex, neural ensembles were recorded while rats made economic decisions on a sequential foraging task. LO contained representations of reward value, and VO contained opposing representations of the opportunity costs associated with waiting out the delay to reward. The relative balance of these representations tracked decisions to approach or leave a reward during each stage of an encounter (i.e., task state) but scaled with externally and internally induced changes in reward value (reward scarcity and hunger, respectively). Representations of value in LO and opportunity costs in VO persisted throughout each stage of an encounter but were realized by distinct clusters of cells within each task state. Thus, LO and VO encoded opposing representations to guide sequential foraging decisions using a shared coding scheme that multiplexed information about value, via overall activity, with task state, via cell clusters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.