ReviewTrends in neurosciences2025
A functional perspective on astrocyte heterogeneity.
Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glial Dysfunction and Memory Impairments in a Model of Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Glia · 2026Article
- Article
- Astrocytes viewed through the lens of their proteomes and subproteomes.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026Review
- Epigenetic mechanisms in traumatic brain injury: a focus on astrocytes and therapeutic implications.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Review
- Glial cells in chronic inflammation: diversity, dysfunction and therapeutic targeting.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026Review
- Biochemical Regulation of Brain Kynurenic Acid Synthesis and Inhibition in Rats Is Sensitive to the Time of Day.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Cerebellar astrocytic alterations in depression.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Astrocyte epigenetics in development, aging, and neurodegeneration: a DNA methylation perspective.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026Review
- Regulatory mechanisms and research progress of astrocytes in the neuro-endocrine-immune network.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Astrocytic SIRT1 ameliorates cognitive deficits after traumatic brain injury via autophagy-mediated MEGF10 phagocytosis.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2025Article
- Review
- Beyond the canonical niche: how astrocytes carried neurogenic potential into the brain parenchyma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Astrocyte epigenetics as a priority area in neuroscience research.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Astrocytes are glial cells of the central nervous system (CNS) that perform an array of diverse functions that are essential for brain activity. Studies on the functional diversity of astrocytes suggest that such diversity may be derived from specialized populations. We provide an overview of the current state of research on astrocyte diversity and outline current challenges and knowledge gaps while also examining the developmental origins of these populations and how their interactions with neurons contribute to their functional heterogeneity. We highlight recent studies that provide evidence for functionally diverse astrocyte populations under homeostatic conditions and as an adaptive response to a range of experiences. This review provides a framework for understanding the dynamic and heterogeneous features of astrocytes across the CNS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.