ArticleArchivos de cardiologia de Mexico2025
Strong correlation between the gain in METs-load and training volumen after a cardiac rehabilitation program.
Article in Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The cardiac rehabilitation program (CRP) is an interdisciplinary therapeutic strategy that improves cardiovascular fitness (CVFit) with an impact on survival. It is not enough evidence that this gain is associated with the quantification of training volume (TV). Our hypothesis is that this gain in metabolic equivalent of task (METs) depends on exercise training dose. We aim to correlate the level of TV with METs achieved in patients with cardiovascular disease after a CRP. Methods: The CRP program consisted of 3 weekly sessions (30 min session of aerobic [AR] training between 65-85% of the reserve heart rate plus 30 min of kinesiotherapy) and interdisciplinary nutrition, psychology and preventive education care, for 4-6 weeks. METs were evaluated according to the initial and post-CRP exercise test. TV was calculated in each AR session in kcal/wk multiplied by the number of weeks completed. Pearson correlation (r) was performed and was considered positive if r > 0.10 and significant if p < 0.05. Results: Quasi-experimental study with 552 patients, predominantly male (73%), median age 61 years, and average LVEF 43%. METs increased post-CRP, with a median differential (Delta-METs) of 3.09, while the TV median was calculated at 733.53 kcal/wk, with a strong positive correlation between both (r = 0.8867; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The greater the volume of AR resistance training achieved, calculated in kcal/wk, the greater the adaptive gain in CVFit measured in METs. The above makes it essential to carefully calculate TV because the progression of the intensity, duration, and/or frequency of training could help in optimizing the results of a CRP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.