Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40695889›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

Diagnosis models to predict peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta analysis.

Xiaoyan Quan, Huarong Xiong, Xiaoyu Liu, Pan Song, Dan Wang, Qin Chen, Xiaoli Hu, Meihong Shi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaoyan QuanDepartment of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Huarong XiongDepartment of Endocrinology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Xiaoyu LiuNursing School, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Pan SongDepartment of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Dan WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Qin ChenNursing School, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Xiaoli HuNursing School, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Meihong ShiDepartment of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China. shimeihong@swmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Luzhou Science and Technology Program 2023RQN182Sichuan Science and Technology Program 24NSFSC3933the 2021 Research Project of Southwest Medical University 2021ZKMS003the Sichuan Provincial Key Laboratory of Nursing in 2023 HLKF2023 (Y)-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects approximately 236.62 million individuals globally, exposing them to significantly increased risks of major limb events such as death and amputation. Concurrently, the number of diagnostic prediction models for PAD patients is steadily rising; however, these studies exhibit varying results, and their quality and applicability in clinical practice and future research remain unclear. To systematically assess the methodological quality of studies on PAD diagnostic prediction models. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched to identify studies which aiming to develop or validate a diagnostic prediction model of PAD. The retrieval time limit is from the establishment of the database to June 1, 2025. Two researchers independently screened and extracted data from eligible studies and evaluated the risk of bias using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). A total of 24 studies on PAD diagnostic prediction models were included, most of which exhibited high risk of bias, predominantly in the domains of study population and statistical analysis. The meta-analyzed Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) was 0.79 [0.74, 0.84], indicating favorable model performance. The reported number of predictor variables ranged from 2 to 20, with common predictors including age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and BMI. This study demonstrates that PAD diagnostic prediction models exhibit good predictive performance, albeit accompanied by a high risk of bias and substantial heterogeneity across studies. Future research on modeling should emphasize comprehensive methodological enhancements in model design, construction, evaluation, and validation, with full disclosure of crucial model information. It should also utilize network computing for presenting model outcomes and conduct large-scale, multi-center external validation of existing models to promote their clinical application.Trial registration: This study protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024557144).

Indexed as

Peripheral Arterial DiseaseHumansRisk FactorsROC CurveDiagnosisMeta-analysisPeripheral arterial diseasePrediction modelSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40695889
PMCPMC12284076

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.