ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrative analysis of thiamethoxam induced hepatocellular carcinoma toxicity mechanisms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Proof-of-concept engineering of Escherichia coli expressing a bee-derived cytochrome P450 monooxygenase for thiamethoxam detoxification.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neonicotinoid (NEO) pesticides play a crucial role in agricultural production. However, their potential risks to human health and the environment cannot be overlooked. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the toxicity and mode of action of NEOs, thiamethoxam (THX), which exhibits the highest potential for carcinogenicity and hepatotoxicity, was selected as the subject of this study. We identified 61 intersection genes between THX targets and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-related genes. These genes were then uploaded to the Metascape database for Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses. The GO analysis indicated that the significant biological processes mainly involved the response to xenobiotic stimuli, cellular response to chemical stress, cellular response to biotic stimuli, and response to toxic substances. The KEGG enrichment analysis pinpointed several key pathways, primarily including the cell cycle and Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis. Subsequently, the intersection genes were imported into the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases to analyze expression differences, leading to the identification of 15 significantly differentially expressed core genes (SDECGs). By applying the Support Vector Machine (SVM) machine-learning model, we screened out five feature genes (CYP2C19, CYP3A4, FBP1, THBS4, CYP7A1) and constructed a nomogram. Molecular docking of THX with these five feature genes showed binding energies of less than -5 kcal/mol. This study offers a theoretical foundation for understanding the underlying mechanisms of THX-induced HCC. The findings provide a scientific basis for the safety assessment of THX in agricultural applications and contribute to the establishment of pesticide safety standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.