ArticleCommunications biology2025
Beyond the nuclear border: single-cell analysis of in situ sequenced human brain tissue using cellular features.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial transcriptomic profiling of decalcified murine musculoskeletal samples via Xenium Prime 5K.JBMR plus · 2026Article
- Improving Spatial Transcriptomics with Dual-Color Coding and Cell Painting.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Cellular heterogeneity and multicellular mechanisms in the pathogenesis of late-life depression: insights from single-cell and spatial multi-omics.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Beyond the nuclear border: single-cell analysis of in situ sequenced human brain tissue using cellular features.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics has advanced our understanding of cellular heterogeneity at single-cell resolution. Here, we assess the suitability of in situ sequencing (ISS) for analyzing formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) postmortem human brain tissue. A key challenge in ISS data analysis is optimizing transcript allocation while minimizing misallocation, particularly in the morphologically complex central nervous system (CNS). We compared geospatial methods using nuclear and expanded nuclear boundaries for segmentation and transcript allocation. While overall cell-type proportions remained comparable, transcript allocation methods affected specific cell types, including microglia, neurons, and neurovascular cells. To enhance specificity, we integrated fluorescent imaging data targeting 18S RNA and IBA1 protein to direct transcript allocation toward RNA-rich cells (e.g., neurons) and microglia, respectively. We demonstrate how this approach, paired with secondary allocation of transcripts outside imaging masks, improved both the number of microglia detected and the specificity of microglial transcripts assigned. Our method offers a flexible and efficient strategy for targeted transcript allocation based on cellular morphology, optimizing CNS cell segmentation in FFPE-preserved human brain tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.