ArticleDermatology and therapy2025
Tapinarof Cream for Adults and Children with Atopic Dermatitis-Efficacy by Race and Fitzpatrick Skin Type in Two Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety Study of Tapinarof for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Children and Adults
A Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety Study of Tapinarof for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Children and Adults
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Immunopathology and Potential Therapeutic Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and skin of color have heterogeneous presentations and treatment outcomes, however, they are underrepresented in trials. In the ADORING 1 and 2 phase 3, 8-week randomized trials, tapinarof cream 1% once daily (QD) demonstrated superior efficacy versus vehicle in adults and children down to age 2 years with AD. These analyses evaluate efficacy of tapinarof cream 1% QD stratified by race and Fitzpatrick skin type.
methodsThe primary endpoint was a Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis™ (vIGA-AD™) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and ≥ 2-grade improvement from baseline at week 8. Secondary endpoints included achieving ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75). Efficacy evaluations used race categories of Asian, Black or African American, and white, and Fitzpatrick skin types I-III and IV-VI.
resultsIn ADORING 1 and 2, 407 and 406 patients were randomized to tapinarof or vehicle QD (7.3-17.0% Asian; 25.9-35.1% Black/African American 43.0-57.7% white), respectively. Across trials, > 50% had Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI. Tapinarof demonstrated significant efficacy in adults and children. By race in both trials, the primary endpoint was met by consistently higher proportions treated with tapinarof than vehicle: Asian, 39.5-48.9% versus 3.7-18.5%; Black/African American, 43.1-47.0% versus 17.5-24.1%; white, 49.4-52.1% versus 12.2-14.5%, respectively. Similar, superior responses were reported across Fitzpatrick skin type groups with tapinarof versus vehicle: I-III, 44.8-49.9% versus 13.5-17.7%; IV-VI, 46.8-49.6% versus 15.3-19.5%. EASI75 responses were similarly higher and consistent with tapinarof versus vehicle. Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate, leading to low trial discontinuations (lower with tapinarof than vehicle).
conclusionsTapinarof demonstrated consistent efficacy and was well tolerated versus vehicle in a large, diverse population with AD, regardless of race or Fitzpatrick skin type.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT05014568, NCT05032859. Graphical Abstract avaliable for this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.