ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Machine learning-based prediction of preterm birth risk using methylation changes in neonatal cord blood CpG sites.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreterm birth, defined as delivery before 37 weeks of gestation, is a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. DNA methylation changes at CpG sites have been associated with the risk of preterm birth.
objectiveThis study aimed to identify differential CpG sites in cord blood and develop predictive machine learning models based on these methylation changes to assess preterm birth risk.
methodsMethylome data from 110 neonatal cord blood samples in the GSE110828 dataset were analyzed to identify CpG sites differing between preterm and full-term births (88 for training, and 22 for testing, respectively). Key CpG sites were selected using Lasso, Elastic Net, and Random Forest. Forty-five predictive models were constructed and evaluated for accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score.
resultsSixty-six CpG sites showed significant differences between preterm and full-term groups. Four models, including Random Forest with Lasso and Gradient Boosting with Random Forest, achieved optimal predictive performance, each with a validation accuracy of 93.75%.
conclusionDNA methylation changes at CpG sites in cord blood are associated with preterm birth risk. CpG-based methylation models demonstrate high predictive accuracy and hold promise for early clinical risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.