Evidence mapPaperPMID 40696379Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2025

Understanding the causes and consequences of low statin adherence: evidence from UK Biobank primary care data.

Deniz Türkmen, Xiaoran Liang, Jane A H Masoli, Dipender Gill, Luke C Pilling, Jack Bowden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deniz Türkmen *Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Xiaoran Liang *Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Jane A H MasoliDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Dipender GillDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, 90 Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, UK.
Luke C PillingDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Jack BowdenDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. j.bowden2@exeter.ac.uk.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research Fellowship NIHR301445UK Medical Research Council research grant MR/X011372/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStatins are prescribed to lower LDL cholesterol. Clinical guidelines recommend 30-50% reduction within 3 months, yet many patients do not achieve this. We investigated predictors of LDL-c reduction, treatment adherence, and adverse clinical outcomes in a sample of UK Biobank participants.

methodsWe analysed 76,000 UK Biobank participants prescribed atorvastatin or simvastatin in primary care: 41,000 had LDL-c measurements before statin initiation (median = 16 days prior, IQR = 28) and within a year of starting treatment (median = 89 days, IQR = 125). Adherence was defined as the "proportion of days covered" (PDC). We estimated associations between PDC within 1 year of statin initiation, genetic factors, post-treatment LDL-c reduction, and clinical adverse outcomes. For 13,000 patients with ≥ 3 LDL-c measures, we used inverse probability of treatment weighting methods to estimate the effect of sustained adherence intervention on LDL-c reduction longitudinally.

resultsLDL-c reduction following statin initiation was predicted by time until the 1st measurement (up to 26% greater reduction if returned ≤ 3 months vs > 3 months), PDC (up to 38% reduction when PDC > 95% [high] vs. 15% when PDC < 50% [low]), and the pharmacogenetic variant SLCO1B1*5 (lowest reduction in CC-allele: 37% versus TT-allele: 39.5%). Longitudinal causal modelling showed that the most recent PDC measure exerted the largest influence on overall LDL-c reduction, followed by the initial PDC. Genetic predictors of reduced PDC included liability to schizophrenia (Coef

conclusionsWe identify substantial variability in the time to first on-treatment LDL-c measurements and also in adherence to statin medication, highlighting a gap between NHS guidelines, LDL-c monitoring, and statin adherence. We show its subsequent impact on long-term health, demonstrating the potential effect of targeted interventions to improve adherence. We identify important predictors of reduced statin effectiveness, including pharmacogenetic variants, polygenic scores, but most of all, adherence. Tailored statin therapy strategies with patient education on statin indication and adherence could optimize treatment efficacy, safety, and long-term clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Cholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMedication AdherencePrimary Health CareAgedAtorvastatinBiological Specimen BanksFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSimvastatinUK BiobankUnited KingdomAtorvastatinCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsSimvastatinAdherenceCardiovascularClinical outcomesPharmacogenomicsPrimary careStatin

Identifiers

PMID40696379
PMCPMC12285031

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.