Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40696380›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2025

Ephaptic conduction molding memory engrams.

A Rabinovitch, R Rabinovitch, D Braunstein, E Smolik, Y Biton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A RabinovitchPhysics Dept. Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel. avinoam@bgu.ac.il.
R RabinovitchMakif YudAlef, Rishon Lezion, Israel.
D BraunsteinPhysics Dept. Sami Shamoon College of Engineering, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
E SmolikPhysics Dept. Sami Shamoon College of Engineering, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Y BitonPhysics Dept. Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMemories are programmed in the brain as connected neuronal ensembles called engrams. However, the method by which the brain forms engrams during memory encoding is not understood.

resultsWe have created a mechanistic mathematical model showing a possible method of the encoding process. Our model is based on the cellular automata approach, which can specifically distinguish between neurons operated on by the synaptic and those operated on by the ephaptic modes. This feature allows us to confirm that the ephaptic mode induces the formation of repeating collections of operating neurons (sub-engrams) that can become memory-preserving entities, and the synaptic influence is manifested by molding these sub-engrams by pruning small ones and size-increasing and rounding larger ones to form the engrams' final structures.

conclusionsEphaptic and synaptic dual-participation in the memory encoding process was exhibited. The sequence of activities was unveiled. We also speculate on possible procedures the brain can employ to enable the ephaptic mode to overtake the normal, synaptic-dominating one.

Indexed as

BrainMemoryModels, NeurologicalNeuronsSynapsesAnimalsEngram formationEphaptic dominationMemory encodingSub-engramsSynaptic molding

Identifiers

PMID40696380
PMCPMC12285051

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.