ArticleImplementation science communications2025
Portfolio analysis of NCI-funded policy implementation science grants (fiscal years 2014-2023).
Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Policy actors' perspectives on improving federal grants to promote the implementation success of evidence-based behavioral health practices.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe dynamic landscape of cancer implementation science (IS) has seen a significant rise in the use of policy as a tool. This analysis explores the multifaceted nature of policy in IS, not only as a directive to be adopted or implemented but also as context that can influence or a strategy that can shape and support effective implementation of cancer control interventions.
methodsThe NIH Query View Report tool was used to identify National Cancer Institute-funded IS grants related to policy between fiscal years 2014-2023. Three coders reviewed the abstracts and specific aims of the grants to ensure a focus on IS, followed by a secondary review to verify the relation to policy. Eligible grants were then coded to determine policy conceptualization methods, level of policy being targeted, alignment with U.S. National Cancer Institute activities, cancer continuum focus, cancer type(s), and cancer content area.
resultsOf the 41 IS grants identified, 14 (34.1%) were included in the analysis. More than half (n = 8, 57.1%) of the grants were awarded in FY2020-2023. Most (n = 10, 71.4%) grants conceptualized policy as something to implement, 28.6% (n = 4) each conceptualized policy as a strategy to use or as something to adopt, and 35.7% (n = 5) as context to understand. Ten grants (71.4%) addressed cancer prevention, three grants (21.4%) addressed new innovations, and two grants each (14.3%) addressed expanding access to cancer screenings and supporting cancer survivors and their caregivers. No grants examined policies that address toxic and environmental exposures. Seven grants (50%) addressed the National Cancer Institute activities of increasing access to care.
conclusionsThe NCI funds policy IS across the cancer continuum and in alignment with several National Cancer Institute activities. However, there remain many opportunities to expand policy IS, especially regarding policies that impact cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship and policies related to environmental exposures. Our study highlights key opportunities to conduct research that will inform the adoption, implementation, and use of policies to address the cancer burden in the U.S..
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.