Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40696645›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2025

A cross-sectional molecular epidemiological study of biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Nada K Alharbi, Arwa R Elmanakhly, Majid Alhomrani, Abdulhakeem S Alamri, Rasha A Mosbah, Mohamed AbdElrahman, Reham M El-Tarabili, Fatma Alshehri, Mahmoud M Bendary

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nada K AlharbiDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Arwa R ElmanakhlyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Modern University of Technology and Information, Cairo, Egypt.
Majid AlhomraniDepartment of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, The Faculty of Applied Medical Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulhakeem S AlamriDepartment of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, The Faculty of Applied Medical Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Rasha A MosbahInfection Control Unit, Zagazig University Hospital, Zagazig, Egypt.
Mohamed AbdElrahmanClinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, Al-Mustaqbal University, Babylon, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0001-5798-9671
Reham M El-TarabiliDepartment of Bacteriology, Immunology and Mycology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Fatma AlshehriDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mahmoud M BendaryDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Port Said University, Port Said, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-1788-0038

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing concern regarding biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) due to the sudden rise in infection rates and associated morbidity and mortality. Therefore, epidemiological studies, including molecular typing and correlation analysis, are essential for understanding this pathogen. This cross-sectional study investigated epidemiological factors and correlations in MRSA isolates. A total of 300 clinical samples were collected between January and March 2023 from 2 healthcare facilities, including various sample types such as sputum, blood, urine, pus, wound swabs, and other body fluids. This study employed various phenotypic and genotypic methodologies, including adherence assays using standard microtiter plates, the Congo red agar method, antimicrobial resistance and virulence profiling, and multi-locus sequence typing. Among 300 clinical samples from 2 healthcare facilities in Egypt, 94 MRSA isolates were confirmed as biofilm producers. Phylogenetic analysis revealed 8 distinct sequence types (ST8, ST80, ST239, ST15, ST22, ST113, ST398, ST984), found in surgical unit samples across both facilities. Notably, ST22-MRSA was present in all departments, indicating its widespread nature and potential for cross-departmental transmission. ST239-MRSA, the most prevalent strain (22.3%), was found in all departments except burn units. Alarmingly, 95.7% of isolates exhibited multidrug-resistant patterns. However, resistance to vancomycin and imipenem was low among biofilm-producing isolates. The high diversity of MRSA strains suggests multiple sources of infection rather than a single origin. Although most isolates were unrelated, the presence of 2 ST80 isolates in sputum samples from the same unit underscores the importance of targeted infection control within and between hospital areas. ST8-MRSA strains carrying the vanA gene were predominantly identified in body fluid samples, highlighting the need for regular testing in such cases. The diversity of MRSA strains across hospital departments indicates a complex infection landscape with no single source. Although certain genetic markers are linked to specific sequence types, they are not reliable indicators of MRSA clonality. These findings emphasize the need for strict infection control measures and regular testing, particularly for ST8-MRSA in body fluids.

Indexed as

BiofilmsMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcal InfectionsAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross InfectionCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEgyptFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedMolecular EpidemiologyMultilocus Sequence TypingAnti-Bacterial AgentsbiofilmclonalitydiversityMRSAsequence types

Identifiers

PMID40696645
PMCPMC12282711

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.