Trial reportMedicine2025
Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound combined with aerobic exercise on patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled study.
Trial report in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe present study aimed to investigate whether the combination of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) and aerobic exercise (AE) exerts an enhanced therapeutic benefit for patients with knee osteoarthritis.
methodsParticipants were allocated into a LIPUS treatment group, an AE treatment group, and a LIPUS combined with AE (LIPUS + AE) treatment group. Numerical rating scale (NRS) and Lequesne index were determined, and gait analysis was performed before treatment and after 12 weeks of treatment.
resultsThe LIPUS treatment could significantly alleviate NRS score and Lequesne index in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The AE treatment could significantly alleviate NRS score and Lequesne index, accompanied by improvement in stride length, stride speed, and total walking distance. LIPUS + AE treatment further contributed to an improvement in NRS score and Lequesne index, accompanied by improvement in stride length, stride speed, and total walking distance. At the end of treatment, the Lequesne index improvement on LIPUS + AE treatment group was greater than LIPUS or AE group, NRS score improvement on LIPUS + AE treatment group was greater than LIPUS group. The stride speed, stride length, and total walking distance improvements on LIPUS + AE treatment group were greater than either LIPUS or AE group.
conclusionThe study indicates LIPUS + AE treatment is more effective than LIPUS or AE for knee osteoarthritis. LIPUS + AE promises to be a potential rehabilitation therapy for patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.