ArticleJournal of vascular diseases2025
Review of Blood Pressure Control in Vulnerable Older Adults: The Role of Frailty and Sarcopenia.
Article in Journal of vascular diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Labour-type physical activity, metabolic dysregulation, and hypertension in rural older adults: rethinking work, exercise, and health in a cold-climate agricultural community.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Hypertension management profiles in Chinese adults aged 60 years and older.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aging of the global population over recent decades has resulted in an increased prevalence of hypertension in older adults. Hypertension develops with increasing age primarily due to a disastrous feedback loop of increased arterial stiffness and maladaptive hemodynamics; this is compounded by age-related changes in physiology. The risk of adverse hypertension-related outcomes concurrently increases with age, and optimal blood pressure (BP) control in older adults thus becomes increasingly important each year. The results of several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating antihypertension strategies in older adults have concluded that the potential benefits of intensive BP management outweigh the risks of harm. However, the exclusion of frail, multimorbid, and institutionalized individuals limits the generalizability of such findings to the broader population of older patients with hypertension. Secondary analyses and external studies have continued to support intensive BP control strategies in older adults with frailty or sarcopenia. Therefore, based on available evidence, clinicians should continue practicing intensive BP control strategies in the older population, yet careful consideration of functional status, life expectancy, medication side effects, polypharmacy, and multimorbidity must take place to avoid unnecessary harm. Strategies must then be tailored to accommodate modifiers such as frailty and sarcopenia in older adults with hypertension. Knowledge gaps underscore the need for future studies evaluating BP management in older adults that incorporate greater proportions of multimorbid and institutionalized individuals with frailty, assess personalization of treatment, and identify subgroups in which optimal BP levels exist or the permissibility of higher BP levels is safer than BP reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.