ReviewAIMS public health2025
Global health and human well-being - A systematic review.
Review in AIMS public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- US new playbook for global health: balancing national interest and global responsibility.BMJ global health · 2026Review
- Antimicrobial Resistance in the Era of Climate Change: Why We Should All Embrace and Integrate the One Health Approach in Clinical Practice?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Enhancing global disaster preparedness: A scoping review of the current integration of situational awareness and disaster mindset in healthcare education.AIMS public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global health aims to improve health outcomes and promote equity by addressing transnational health issues through cross-disciplinary collaboration. This field merges preventive measures with clinical care to enhance health and reduce disparities. On the other hand, human well-being includes material and non-material factors that influence quality of life and personal fulfillment. Together, they are crucial for sustainable development, aligning with the UN's Sustainable Development Goals. Though often examined separately, understanding their interconnectedness can reveal the root causes of global challenges, such as pandemics and climate change, and inform comprehensive strategies for a healthier, more equitable world. This systematic review updates the current challenges and opportunities in global health and well-being. It highlights the importance of scalable, cost-effective solutions, incorporating global health, environmental sustainability, and local contexts to address issues like antimicrobial resistance (AMR), zoonotic diseases, and climate-related health impacts. The study advocates for a multidisciplinary approach, integrating knowledge from medical microbiology, agriculture, environmental science, and traditional practices. Effective solutions should be holistic and inclusive, incorporating bioinformatics in AMR, One Health strategies, and sustainable food systems through regenerative agriculture. These recommendations support broader health equity goals, emphasizing the deep connections among human, animal, and environmental health that are essential for global well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.