ArticleASIDE internal medicine2025
Efficacy and Safety of Optic Nerve Sheath Fenestration for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. A Subgroup-Focused Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in ASIDE internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical outcomes of optic nerve sheath fenestration in pediatric pseudotumor cerebri syndrome.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Optic nerve sheath fenestration (ONSF) is an important surgical management option for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) who failed medical treatment. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of ONSF, with a focus to identify factors affecting treatment success. Methods: A literature search was conducted up to December 2024. Primary outcomes included improvement in visual acuity, visual fields, and optic disc swelling resolution. We performed a detailed subgroup analysis based on geographic location, study design, surgical approach, and technical variations. Results: Nineteen studies with a total of 1,159 patients were included in our study. ONSF significantly improved visual acuity in 34.5% (95% CI: 31.8-37.3%) and visual fields in 69.4% (95% CI: 65.9-72.7%) of cases. A 90.9% improvement rate was observed in reducing optic disc swelling. Significant heterogeneity was noted in visual acuity (I Conclusions: ONSF demonstrates favorable efficacy in improving visual outcomes with an acceptable safety profile, lower postoperative complications were observed when the procedure was performed in high-volume centers using appropriate surgical techniques. Geographic variations and surgical approaches significantly affected outcomes, highlighting the importance of standardized protocols and adequate surgical experience. Future prospective studies with standardized outcome measures are needed to optimize patient selection and surgical techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.