ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Fair space? Community relations as a booster for improving resilience.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The opportunities of health and happiness are unequally distributed. Multiple triggers lead to social exclusion and can result in homelessness. Efforts are still failing to counter health inequity. Our ethnographic research explores the social pathways of citizens deprived of a home. How can we sustainably promote fair opportunities for all? Methods: Urgent information needs prompted field research among Dutch homeless service users. In semi-structured interviews, we collected information on health and needs. A transdiagnostic, generic strategy is used. Our focus is on the three themes of recovery (meaning, symptoms, and the social dimension), and their evolution over time. From a human rights perspective, the study examines the interactions between homeless service users and their environments. Case descriptions are added for a better understanding of dynamics. Results: The dual snowball sampling resulted in a representative sample of Dutch homeless service users in 2015-2017 (16 facilities, 436 users). The health and needs patterns reveal many interrelations of multiple needs. The user-system interactions uncover a systemic failure to match vital needs of the neediest. The interactions over time expose how social decline occurs and identify opportunities for improvement. The survival strategies show that stress often generates communication barriers, conflict, alienation and neglect. This has a negative impact on the self-image, (in)formal networks and place of users in society. A "deadlocked case" from a local experiment demonstrates how community relations can overcome modern system obstacles, while creating stable conditions for growth. Discussion: Despite abundant care and welfare facilities, many shelter users feel abandoned. Our rights-based ecosystem approach leads to the root causes of unfairness, inherent in the healthcare system and culture. The findings disclose that the resilience of Dutch society suffers (but can withstand) significant erosion. By extension, this applies to modern care systems in high-income countries. Fostering resilience requires meaningful social relationships that offer creative solutions. Exploring dynamics stimulates shared learning in safe and public spaces. Providing networks with concrete tools, the approach can foster a coherent, systematic commitment to enrich fair opportunities and pathways toward thriving.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.