Evidence mapPaperPMID 40698694Full record

ReviewCurrent drug targets2025

Role of Artificial Intelligence in Nanomedicine and Organ-specific Therapy: An Updated Review.

Kuldeep Rajpoot

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current drug targets, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kuldeep RajpootDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Babulal Tarabai Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Sagar, M.P., 470228, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn organ-specific therapy, artificial intelligence (AI) is primarily used to improve surgical planning through image analysis, predict post-transplant outcomes, personalize treatment plans based on patient data, optimize organ allocation logistics, and donor-recipient precision mapping for organs to improve transplants. Furthermore, all these applications ultimately lead to better patient outcomes and enhanced organ therapy.

objectiveThis review aims to examine the revolutionary effects of AI in some key healthcare fields, such as nanomedicine, cancer treatment, clinical applications, and organ-specific delivery.

methodsThis review article discusses in detail the role of AI in nanomedicine, cancer therapy, clinical applications, organ-specific delivery (e.g., cardiovascular, gastroenterology, kidney, liver, lung, ophthalmology, skin, etc.), diagnosis, and radiotherapy. In addition, it also discusses limitations and challenges of AI in healthcare.

resultsAI-based clinical translation has potential but faces challenges like artifact vulnerability, ethical and legal considerations, and security measures. Restrictive data-use policies may hinder accurate analysis. Regulations and collaboration with data-sharing mechanisms could overcome barriers.

conclusionAI is being utilized in organ-specific therapy to enhance donor-recipient matching, surgical planning, post-transplant outcomes prediction, and personalized treatment plans by analyzing patient data.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNanomedicineHumansNeoplasmsOrgan TransplantationPrecision MedicineArtificial intelligenceclinical.diagnosismachine learningnanomedicineneural networksorgan-specific therapy

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.