Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40699296›Full record

ArticleAnatomical science international2026

Morphologic and morphometric study of the long head of the biceps femoris in male cadavers: tendon and MTJ insights for injury diagnosis.

Urszula Emilia Bogacka-Wójcik, Dawid Władysław Dziedzic, Bogdan Mikołaj Ciszek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical science international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Urszula Emilia Bogacka-WójcikDepartment of Descriptive and Clinical Anatomy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. urszula.bogacka@wum.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1873-7863
Dawid Władysław DziedzicDepartment of Descriptive and Clinical Anatomy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Bogdan Mikołaj CiszekDepartment of Descriptive and Clinical Anatomy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The long head of the biceps femoris (BFlh) is among the most frequently injured components of the hamstring complex, particularly at the myotendinous junctions (MTJs). Despite its clinical relevance, the gross morphology of the BFlh-including its tendon structure and anatomic variability-remains insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to provide a detailed anatomic and morphometric analysis of the BFlh, focusing on the proximal and distal tendons and their integration with surrounding muscle fibers. Thirty-five formalin-fixed male cadavers were dissected via a posterior longitudinal approach. Tendons were subdivided into free, intermediate, and intramuscular portions. Morphometric data were collected using digital calipers and flexible measuring tape, and correlation analyses were performed using appropriate statistical methods. The total muscle length ranged from 42.0 to 50.0 cm. The tendons showed consistent segmentation, with significant correlations between tendon lengths and limb dimensions, as well as between MTJp and MTJd lengths. The thinner, more variable intramuscular segments may contribute to increased injury susceptibility. These findings support a standardized understanding of MTJ architecture and may enhance injury classification, diagnosis, and rehabilitation strategies.

Indexed as

Hamstring MusclesHamstring TendonsTendonsAgedAged, 80 and overCadaverHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyotendinous JunctionBiceps femoris muscleDistal tendonMyotendinous junctionProximal attachmentProximal tendon

Identifiers

PMID40699296
PMCPMC13541974

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.