ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025
Medium- to Long-Term Follow-Up Study on Modified Manchester Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review (and Meta-Analysis) and Global Expert Consensus Statements (U-POP): The Manchester Procedure.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisWe evaluated the complications and medium- to long-term therapeutic outcomes of the modified Manchester procedure for pelvic organ prolapse.
methodsThe clinical data of 254 patients who underwent the modified Manchester procedure in our hospital from July 2015 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. In addition, the perioperative situation and medium- to long-term follow-up results were analyzed.
resultsNo injury to the adjacent organs (such as the bladder and ureter) or complications (including massive hemorrhage or hematoma) were reported in 254 patients during the operation. During the perioperative period, urinary retention, postoperative fever, and urinary tract infections were observed in 19 patients (7.5%), 13 patients (5.1%), and three patients (1.2%), respectively. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 8.8 years, with a median follow-up time of 4.18 (2.46, 6.15) years, and 173 patients (68%) completed telephonic or outpatient follow-up. Among them, 16 patients (9.25%) had subjective recurrence. Of these 16 patients, three (1.7%) had failed surgery, nine (5.2%) had de novo stress urinary incontinence, and two (1.2%) had dysuria. The most serious complications were grade III according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. After the operation, the subjective satisfaction rate of the PGI-I questionnaire was 94.8%.
conclusionsThe modified Manchester procedure for pelvic organ prolapse has a low incidence of severe complications, has satisfactory medium- to long-term therapeutic outcomes, and shows favorable safety and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40699355What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.