SynthesisGeroScience2026
Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of circulating bile acids and dementia: a systematic review.
Synthesis in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Microbiota-gut-brain axis and bile acids-driven neuromodulation.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bile acids (BAs) may contribute to dementia by regulating neuroinflammation and influencing gut-brain axis signaling, especially in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, their alterations in dementia development are rather complex and their impact on dementia risk remains inconclusive. To provide a comprehensive understanding of these associations, we systematically reviewed cross-sectional and longitudinal studies on circulating BAs and dementia. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception to August 15, 2024, for population-based observational studies investigating the changes in circulating BAs and the association between BAs and dementia risk. A total of twelve articles were eligible for inclusion, including eleven cross-sectional studies and three longitudinal studies (with two studies overlapping). Cross-sectional studies showed that, compared to cognitively normal individuals, the circulating level of primary BAs such as cholic acid (CA) is reduced, while glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDCA) and most secondary bile acids are increased in dementia. Longitudinal studies further support the findings and found that reduced CA, elevated GCDCA, elevated secondary BAs (glycoursodeoxycholic acid, lithocholic acid (LCA), glycolithocholic acid, and glycodeoxycholic acid (GDCA), and ratios of GDCA: CA, taurodeoxycholic acid: CA correlate with an increased risk of dementia. In addition, CA, chenodeoxycholic acid, allocholic acid, and LCA may be of significance in distinguishing AD patients from healthy people. Multiple evidence showed that reduced CA (primary BAs) level and elevated conjugated or secondary BAs levels are linked to a higher risk of dementia. Bile acids play a complex role in the pathogenesis of dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.