Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40699646›Full record

ReviewCurrent issues in molecular biology2025

Orthobiologics Revisited: A Concise Perspective on Regenerative Orthopedics.

Fábio Ramos Costa, Luyddy Pires, Rubens Andrade Martins, Márcia Santos, Gabriel Silva Santos, João Vitor Lana, Bruno Ramos Costa, Napoliane Santos, Alex Pontes de Macedo, André Kruel and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current issues in molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fábio Ramos CostaDepartment of Orthopedics, FC Sports Traumatology, Salvador 40296-210, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0003-0486-8114
Luyddy PiresDepartment of Orthopedics, Brazilian Institute of Regenerative Medicine (BIRM), Indaiatuba 13334-170, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0007-0725-7940
Rubens Andrade MartinsMedical School, Tiradentes University Center, Maceió 57038-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2513-9864
Márcia SantosNutritional Sciences, Metropolitan Union of Education and Culture, Salvador 42700-000, Brazil.
Gabriel Silva SantosDepartment of Orthopedics, Brazilian Institute of Regenerative Medicine (BIRM), Indaiatuba 13334-170, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0549-6821
João Vitor LanaMedical School, Max Planck University Center (UniMAX), Indaiatuba 13343-060, Brazil.
Bruno Ramos CostaMedical School, Zarns College, Salvador 41720-200, Brazil.
Napoliane SantosDepartment of Orthopedics, Brazilian Institute of Regenerative Medicine (BIRM), Indaiatuba 13334-170, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0002-8938-5498
Alex Pontes de MacedoDepartment of Orthopedics, Brazilian Institute of Regenerative Medicine (BIRM), Indaiatuba 13334-170, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4394-1209
André KruelRegenerative Medicine, Orthoregen International Course, Indaiatuba 13334-170, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7415-3953
José Fábio LanaDepartment of Orthopedics, Brazilian Institute of Regenerative Medicine (BIRM), Indaiatuba 13334-170, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the forefront of regenerative medicine, orthobiologics represent a spectrum of biological substances that offer promising alternatives for tissue repair and regeneration. Traditional surgical treatments often involve significant risks, extended recovery periods, and may not fully restore tissue functionality, creating a strong demand for less invasive options. This paper presents a concise overview of orthobiologics, reexamining their role within the broader landscape of regenerative medicine. Beginning with a brief introduction to orthobiologics, the paper navigates through various types of biological materials and their associated mechanisms of action and clinical applications. By highlighting platelet derivatives, bone marrow-derived products, and processed adipose tissue, among others, it underscores the pivotal role of orthobiologics in prompting biological responses like cellular proliferation, differentiation, and angiogenesis, thereby fostering tissue healing. Furthermore, this paper explores the diverse applications of orthobiologics in orthopedic conditions, outlining their utility in the treatment of bone and soft-tissue injuries. Addressing clinical considerations, it discusses safety profiles, efficacy, patient selection criteria, and emerging challenges. With the limitations of traditional medicine becoming more apparent, orthobiologics offer an innovative and less invasive approach to patient care. Looking forward, this paper approaches future directions in orthobiologics research, emphasizing the need for continued innovation and exploration. Through a concise perspective, this paper aims to provide clinicians, researchers, and stakeholders with a comprehensive understanding of orthobiologics and their evolving role in regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

growth factorsorthobiologicsregenerative medicinestem cellstissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID40699646
PMCPMC12025442

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.