Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40699691›Full record

ArticleCurrent issues in molecular biology2025

In Silico Design of Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) Assay Probes for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Personalised Treatment.

Trevor Kenneth Wilson, Oliver Tendayi Zishiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current issues in molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Trevor Kenneth WilsonDiscipline of Genetics, College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2247-5878
Oliver Tendayi ZishiriDiscipline of Genetics, College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9741-4124

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is one of the world's leading causes of cancer-related mortalities. There are several diagnostic tools and treatment plans readily available, such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, these all come with their setbacks. Therefore, alternatives must be developed to assist those patients for whom standardised treatment does not work. There are many genes whose mutations lead to prostate cancer development and progression. These mutations may also lead to higher resistance/vulnerability to specific therapies. In this in silico study, four genes, AR, ATM, PTEN, and TP53, were assessed, and mutations were chosen for qPCR primer and probe design. A total of 28 mutations were selected from the four genes, with PTEN (13) making up the majority of the mutations, followed by TP53 (six), then ATM (five), and finally, AR (four). All primer/probe combinations fall within the desired ranges for this study and provide valuable additions to prostate cancer's diagnostic/prognostic landscape. These assays will require further experimental validation, but they are the first step toward a better future in the fight against this horrible disease.

Indexed as

diagnosisgenetic mutationspersonalised treatmentprognosisprostate cancerqPCR assay

Identifiers

PMID40699691
PMCPMC12025841

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.