Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40700409›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2025

Utilization of telerehabilitation in TKR patients: A systematic review.

Farnaz Salehian, Jahanpour Alipour, Somayyeh Zakerabasali

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Farnaz SalehianStudent Research Committee, Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Jahanpour AlipourDepartment of Health Information Management, Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Somayyeh ZakerabasaliClinical Education Research Center, Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1399-9234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdvanced telerehabilitation technology helps physiotherapists monitor the patient's treatment process after Total Knee Replacement. This study aimed to review the research on telerehabilitation after Total Knee Replacement, synthesize the findings related to their applications and features, and address evaluations made on them.

methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from 2019 through 2023. The authors selected the articles based on keywords and criteria and reviewed them in terms of title, abstract, and full text. Full-text articles and English language, focusing on telerehabilitation for TKR patients, preferably including mobile health applications and consistent with the research question, were considered for more review. Then, the MMAT (mixed methods appraisal) tool was used to assess each article. Finally, the selected articles were evaluated. The systematic review was registered through PROSPERO with registration ID: PROSPERO CRD42024533040.

resultAfter reviewing databases, 183 articles were retrieved, then 84 duplicate articles were removed. Of the remaining 99 articles, 40 were deleted after reviewing the title and abstract because they were grey literature or irrelevant to TKR surgery, and 41 were deleted after reviewing the full text. Finally, 18 articles were included in this study and analyzed. The United States was the most common country that developed a telerehabilitation system. The most common use of this technology has been in education, treatment, and subsequent monitoring. Sensor and wearable activity trackers are the most common equipment used in studies. The most common study designs were randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies, each of which accounted for 9 (50%) and 4 (22.22%), respectively.

conclusionTelerehabilitation can be as effective as traditional rehabilitation in improving the condition of patients after TKA. However, it is suggested that improvements should always be made to achieve better results of telerehabilitation. Most of the TKA apps in the reviewed studies showed significant effectiveness. Information and communication technology are used to provide high-quality, low-cost, continuous treatments. Soon, telerehabilitation will play a more prominent role and will be more popular.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeTelerehabilitationHumans

Identifiers

PMID40700409
PMCPMC12286395

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.