ArticlePloS one2025
"The message hurts, but it would be worse if nothing was said" - Communicating severe illness and the imminence of death to patients with end stage heart failure and their families - A longitudinal interview study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsDiscussions about severe illness and the coming death do not often take place with patients with heart failure and their family. We therefore aimed to investigate how patients with end-stage heart failure and their family who discussed terminal illness and the imminence of death with a physician, experienced such communication, how they handled life emotionally and practically after said discussions, and if/how this changed over time.
methodsA longitudinal interview study. Ten patients with end-stage heart failure and their closest kin were visited by a physician at home and discussed terminal illness during one visit and the imminence of death during another visit. They were interviewed three times about how they experienced the communication and how they handled life in this situation and in relation to the discussions. The interviews were analysed using qualitative thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke.
findingsTwo main themes and five subthemes were found. The first theme was 'an honest and clear message hurts, but it would be worse if nothing was said', and the subthemes included information on the experiences of communication, the desired level of communication by patients and family members and factors facilitating communication. The second theme was 'A clear message helps in handling life' with the subthemes of coping psychologically and practically. The findings indicate that for some patients and family members it was hard to have discussions about end-stage heart failure and the imminence of death. However, they found the discussions important and were happy that the information was not withheld from them. The discussions helped in handling life and most patients and family seemed to have found a way to accept and handle the situation. Practical planning often did not start until they heard from the physician that death could come soon.
conclusionThis study confirms that patients and family members want and appreciate discussions about severe illness and the imminence of death and find them important. This can encourage physicians to change behaviour and engage in honest discussions, and to educate and train colleagues to do the same.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.