ArticlePloS one2025
Naps, night-time sleep and cognitive function among middle-aged and older people in China.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is increasing interest in how sleep affects cognitive function; however, the combined impact of naps and night-time sleep on different cognitive domains is still not well understood. This study investigates the relationship between naps, night-time sleep, and cognitive function over time among middle-aged and older adults in China, as well as how this relationship may differ between rural and urban residents.
methodsA total of 2,938 community residents aged 45 and older were selected from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS, conducted in 2013, 2015, and 2018). The study examined the relationship between napping, night-time sleep, and cognitive function using fixed-effects analysis over a period of five years.
resultsSleeping 6-8 hours/ night and napping for less than 30 minutes/ day were associated with better cognitive function (β = 0.383, 95% CI: 0.198, 0.567) and memory (β = 0.304, 95% CI: 0.155, 0.451) across the entire sample. In contrast, sleeping more than 8 hours/ night and napping more than 90 minutes/ day were associated with poor mental status. Specifically, sleeping 6-8 hours/ night was significantly associated with better cognitive function (β = 0.501, 95% CI: 0.252, 0.750) and memory (β = 0.372, 95% CI: 0.173, 0.572) in rural respondents. Sleeping more than 8 hours/ night was associated with poorer mental status among urban respondents (β = -0.291, 95% CI: -0.551, -0.032). Rural respondents who napped less than 90 minutes/ day had improved cognitive function. Napping for more than 90 minutes/ day was significantly correlated with cognitive function and mental status, which was primarily observed among urban respondents.
conclusionsConsiderable differences were observed between rural and urban areas regarding the relationship between napping, night-time sleep, and cognitive function. When designing interventions to enhance cognitive function, it's essential to take into account cultural context, geographical factors, and individual differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.