Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40700852›Full record

Trial reportGynecologic oncology2025

A phase II, randomized, double-blind study of the use of rucaparib vs. placebo maintenance therapy in metastatic and recurrent endometrial cancer.

Bradley R Corr, Ashley Haggerty, Stefan M Gysler, Sarah Taylor, Kian Behbakht, Jill Alldredge, Carolyn Lefkowits, Lindsay W Brubaker, Catherine Bouts, Lisa Marie Babayan and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gynecologic oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03617679 (A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Use of Rucaparib vs. Placebo Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic and Recurrent Endometrial Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03617679 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Use of Rucaparib vs. Placebo Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic and Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2019 to 2026Enrolled79ConditionsMetastatic Endometrial CancerArmsRucaparib, Placebo Oral Tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Bradley R CorrUniversity of Colorado Hospital, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Academic Office 1, Mail-Stop B198-412631 E. 17(th) AveAurora, Colorado 80045 USA. Electronic address: Bradley.corr@cuanschutz.edu.
Ashley HaggertyHackensack Meridian Health School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,1 Riverview Plaza, Red Bank, NJ 07701 USA.
Stefan M GyslerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
Sarah TaylorUniversity of Pittsburgh Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, 300 Halket St., Pittsburgh, PA 15215 USA.
Kian BehbakhtUniversity of Colorado Hospital, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Academic Office 1, Mail-Stop B198-412631 E. 17(th) AveAurora, Colorado 80045 USA.
Jill AlldredgeUniversity of Colorado Hospital, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Academic Office 1, Mail-Stop B198-412631 E. 17(th) AveAurora, Colorado 80045 USA.
Carolyn LefkowitsUniversity of Colorado Hospital, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Academic Office 1, Mail-Stop B198-412631 E. 17(th) AveAurora, Colorado 80045 USA.
Lindsay W BrubakerUniversity of Colorado Hospital, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Academic Office 1, Mail-Stop B198-412631 E. 17(th) AveAurora, Colorado 80045 USA.
Catherine BoutsUniversity of Colorado Hospital, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Academic Office 1, Mail-Stop B198-412631 E. 17(th) AveAurora, Colorado 80045 USA.
Lisa Marie BabayanUniversity of Colorado Hospital, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Academic Office 1, Mail-Stop B198-412631 E. 17(th) AveAurora, Colorado 80045 USA.
Lainie P MartinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
James CostelloUniversity of Colorado Hospital, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Academic Office 1, Mail-Stop B198-412631 E. 17(th) AveAurora, Colorado 80045 USA.
Benjamin G BitlerUniversity of Colorado Hospital, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Academic Office 1, Mail-Stop B198-412631 E. 17(th) AveAurora, Colorado 80045 USA.
Junxiao HuUniversity of Colorado Hospital, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Academic Office 1, Mail-Stop B198-412631 E. 17(th) AveAurora, Colorado 80045 USA.
Saketh R GuntupalliUniversity of Colorado Hospital, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Academic Office 1, Mail-Stop B198-412631 E. 17(th) AveAurora, Colorado 80045 USA.

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
Evaluation of combination CLK/DYRK (Cirtuvivint) inhibition with PARP inhibition (Olaparib) in BRCA/HRD platinum resistant ovarian cancerR01CA288651 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Bradley Corr · 2024 to 2026
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934NCI NIH HHS R01 CA288651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRucaparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor with proven efficacy in multiple tumor types. The efficacy of PARP inhibition in endometrial cancer remains unclear.

methodsWe conducted a multi-institutional, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial. Eligible patients had stage III, IV or recurrent endometrial cancer. We assigned patients with measurable, or non-measurable disease following completion of first- or second-line chemotherapy in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral rucaparib (600 mg twice daily) or placebo until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes were overall survival and safety. Exploratory outcomes evaluated response in relation to tumor molecular profiles and transcriptomic profiles.

results79 patients were randomized, 39 received rucaparib and 40 received placebo. Median progression free survival was 28.1 months in the rucaparib arm compared to 8.7 months in the placebo group, hazard ratio 0.45; (95 % confidence interval [CI] (0.24-0.87); p = 0.02). Median overall survival was not reached in the rucaparib arm compared to 28.4 months in the placebo arm; hazard ratio 0.43 (95 % CI, 0.18-1.05). In patients treated with rucaparib, the most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were anemia, fatigue, and neutropenia. Loss of p53 activity correlated to improved rucaparib response by transcriptomic evaluation. Traditional DNA repair homologous recombination biomarkers did not correlate with response.

conclusionsMaintenance use of rucaparib after first- or second-line chemotherapy demonstrates promising activity and warrants further evaluation in a phase III evaluation. Adverse events were aligned with previous use of rucaparib in other tumor types and no new safety signals were identified. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT03617679.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsIndolesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaintenance ChemotherapyMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalIndolesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsrucaparibEndometrial cancerMaintenance therapyPARP

Identifiers

PMID40700852
PMCPMC12398225

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.