ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025
Reassessment of variants of uncertain significance in tumor suppressor genes using new ClinGen PP1/PP4 criteria guidance.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Genomic Data Analysis: New Frontiers in Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Correlates of Disease-Free Survival in Endometrial Stromal Sarcomas: A Multicenter Retrospective Study From 2017 to 2025.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2026Article
- Uncertainty, ethics, and progress in genomic medicine.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, new clinical genome resource (ClinGen) guidance focusing on cosegregation (PP1) and phenotype-specificity criteria (PP4) were introduced, based on the observation that the phenotype specificity could provide greater level of pathogenicity evidence. This study aimed to reassess variants of uncertain significance (VUS) found in tumor suppressor genes with specific phenotypes using these new recommendations. We retrieved VUS from an in-house database of all germline variants detected using sequencing since 2008. Patients carrying VUS from seven target tumor suppressor genes, NF1, TSC1, TSC2, RB1, PTCH1, STK11, and FH, were selected and the pathogenicity of each variant was reassessed using the new ClinGen PP1/PP4 criteria. In total, 128 unique VUS from 145 carriers were evaluated. Initial classification using the classic PP1/PP4 criteria from ACMG/AMP and point-based classification resulted in 21 variants being reclassified (2 pathogenic variants, 3 likely pathogenic variants [LPVs], 15 likely benign variants, and 1 benign variant), leaving 101 VUS. Applying the new ClinGen PP1/PP4 criteria, 32 (31.4%) remaining VUS were reclassified as LPVs. The reclassification rate was highest in STK11 (88.9%). Representative cases highlighted successful reclassification owing to highly specific phenotypes aligned with the new criteria. The new ClinGen PP1/PP4 criteria significantly improved the reclassification of VUS in tumor suppressor genes associated with specific phenotypes. The new criteria could substantially enhance the accuracy of variant classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.