ArticleBMC genomics2025
Codon usage bias is presumably affected by tRNA selection effects in Actinidia polyploidization events.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPolyploidization is one of the main mechanisms in speciation, yet its effects on the frequency and distribution of synonymous codons remain unclear, which may lead to distinct patterns of codon usage bias (CUB) in polyploid species. To detect whether the patterns of CUB change in Actinidia polyploidization events, we analyzed seven Actinidia species (two polyploid and five diploid species) and five phylogenetically related non-Actinidia species (one polyploid and four diploid species).
resultsThe GC and GC3 contents in the 12 plant genomes were below 50%, indicating a preference for A/T-rich nucleotides and A/T-ending codons in these species. The effective number of codons (ENC) and GC3s showed a left-skewed distribution pattern, suggesting that natural selection is the main factor in determining codon usage variation. The species tree inferred from relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of orthologs was associated with their phylogenetic relationship. No significant difference in CUB was detected among the subgenomes of A. deliciosa. Diploid A. chinensis and polyploid A. deliciosa shared some optimal codons, such as proline (CCG, CCA), glycine (GGC), and leucine (CTG). Diploid A. chinensis uniquely preferred the asparagine codons AAT and AAC, while polyploid A. deliciosa favored the optimal codons GGT (glycine), AAG (lysine), and GAT/GAC (aspartic acid). Significant correlations (S-values) of ENC and tRNA adaptation index (tAI) indicate tRNA selection effects on CUB, and the Actinidia species exhibited higher S-values (0.33-0.41) than the other non-Actinidia species (0.22-0.34).
conclusionsOur findings highlight that CUB in Actinidia was not affected by polyploidization events but by natural selection, and the dominant force of shaping CUB is tRNA availability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.