Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702468›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

Sugarcane yellow leaf virus impairs the transcriptomic defense response of sugarcane to its new aphid vector Melanaphis sorghi.

Ricardo José Gonzaga Pimenta, Alexandre Hild Aono, Danilo Augusto Sforça, Maria Natália Guindalini Melloni, Marcos Cesar Gonçalves, Luciana Rossini Pinto, Anete Pereira de Souza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ricardo José Gonzaga PimentaInstitute of Biology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, 13083-862, Brazil.
Alexandre Hild AonoInstitute of Biology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, 13083-862, Brazil.
Danilo Augusto SforçaCentre for Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering (CBMEG), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, 13083-875, Brazil.
Maria Natália Guindalini MelloniAdvanced Centre for Sugarcane Research and Development, Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC/APTA), Ribeirão Preto, 14032-800, Brazil.
Marcos Cesar GonçalvesPlant Protection Research Centre, Instituto Biológico (IB/APTA), São Paulo, 04016-035, Brazil.
Luciana Rossini PintoAdvanced Centre for Sugarcane Research and Development, Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC/APTA), Ribeirão Preto, 14032-800, Brazil.
Anete Pereira de SouzaInstitute of Biology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, 13083-862, Brazil. anete@unicamp.br.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 424050/2016-1Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2018/18588-8, 2019/21682-9, 2019/03232-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is a preeminent sugar and bioenergy crop and has great economic importance in tropical countries. A major disease affecting this crop is yellow leaf disease, caused by sugarcane yellow leaf virus (SCYLV, Polerovirus SCYLV, Solemoviridae). The sugarcane aphid Melanaphis sacchari is considered the main vector of SCYLV, and the closely related sorghum aphid Melanaphis sorghi, which has recently emerged as a pest of great relevance in sorghum, has also been suspected to be a vector. Genetic resistance is an important resource for preventing yield losses caused by SCYLV and its vectors, but knowledge on the underlying molecular mechanisms is lacking. Therefore, the present work aimed to investigate the transcriptomic responses of sugarcane to SCYLV and M. sorghi, which was reported to transmit this virus for the first time herein.

resultsTwo sugarcane cultivars, one susceptible and one tolerant to SCYLV, were fed upon by aviruliferous and viruliferous aphids. The transcriptome of the plants was assessed via RNA-Seq via differential gene expression analyses and a gene coexpression network. The susceptible cultivar showed an incipient reaction to both M. sorghi and SCYLV, with very few differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in comparison with aphid-free plants. The response of the tolerant cultivar to aviruliferous M. sorghi involved pathways typically associated with defense against herbivory, which were also enriched in coexpression network modules in which DEGs were overrepresented. Some of these genes were hubs in their respective modules, indicating that they are potential key regulators of defense responses. However, these responses were diminished when viruliferous aphids were used, and other processes linked to infection with SCYLV were altered.

conclusionsThese results indicated that SCYLV could affect sugarcane defense responses to its vector, similar to other viruses of the same genus. Possible implications for the epidemiology and impact of SCYLV and M. sorghi are discussed.

Indexed as

AphidsInsect VectorsLuteoviridaePlant DiseasesSaccharumTranscriptomeAnimalsGene coexpression networkRNA-SeqSaccharumSCYLVSorghum aphidYLD

Identifiers

PMID40702468
PMCPMC12285015

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.