Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702736›Full record

ReviewEndocrinology2025

Navigating the Strengths and Constraints of Mouse Models in Obesity Research.

Patric J D Delhanty, Jenny A Visser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Resilient Calvarial Bone Marrow Supports Retinal Repair in Type 2 Diabetes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patric J D DelhantyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam 3015 GD, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0828-3143
Jenny A VisserDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam 3015 GD, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7182-3571

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a major health problem, being a risk factor for many metabolic diseases. Obesity results from an imbalance in energy intake and energy expenditure. Animal models, particularly naturally occurring mouse models of obesity, have provided a framework of the basic mechanisms regulating energy homeostasis. However, there remain gaps in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of obesity. Mouse models of obesity remain an essential tool to further our knowledge, due to advanced tools for genetic manipulation and the possibility to study interaction with environmental factors, such as diet. While there are advantages to using mice as models of obesity, it should be recognized that there are limitations. In this mini-review we provide a brief overview of the monogenic mouse models of obesity that have led to the discovery of important physiological systems that regulate energy homeostasis, such as the leptin-melanocortin pathway, that translate well to humans. We also discuss confounding factors that, when taken into account, might improve translatability of these findings. Finally, we discuss potential strategies to determine functional consequences of non-coding genome-wide association study (GWAS) signals in mouse models.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalObesityAnimalsEnergy MetabolismGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLeptinMiceLeptincross-species conservationmonogenic obesitymouse modelssex differencesthermogenesis

Identifiers

PMID40702736
PMCPMC12342185

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.