Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40703135›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025

Artificial intelligence analysis of the single-lead ECG predicts long-term clinical outcomes.

Abdullah Alrumayh, Patrik Bächtiger, Arunashis Sau, Josephine Mansell, Melanie T Almonte, Karanjot Chhatwal, Fu Siong Ng, Mihir A Kelshiker, Nicholas S Peters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abdullah AlrumayhNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9538-2202
Patrik BächtigerNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3502-8869
Arunashis SauNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0204-7078
Josephine MansellNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.
Melanie T AlmonteNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2448-4866
Karanjot ChhatwalNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8061-6237
Fu Siong NgNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.
Mihir A KelshikerNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8189-7571
Nicholas S PetersNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3581-8078

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Artificial intelligence (AI) applied to a single-lead electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) can detect impaired left ventricular systolic dysfunction [LVSD: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%]. This study aimed to determine if AI-ECG can also predict the two-year risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality independent of LVSD. Methods and results: Clinical outcomes after two-year follow-up were collected on patients who attended for routine echocardiography and received simultaneous single-lead-ECG recording for AI-ECG analysis. MACE and all-cause mortality were compared by Cox regression, measured against the classification of LVEF > or ≤40%. A subgroup analysis was performed on patients with echocardiographic LVEF ≥ 50%. With previously established thresholds, 'positive' AI-ECG was defined as an LVEF-predicted ≤40%, and negative AI-ECG signified an LVEF-predicted >40%; 1007 patients were included for analysis (mean age, 62.3 years; 52.4% male). 339 (33.7%) had an AI-ECG-predicted LVEF ≤ 40% and had a higher MACE rate (LVEF ≤ 40% vs. >40%: 34.2% vs.11.9%; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.93; 95% CI, 1.39-2.69; Conclusion: An AI-ECG algorithm designed to detect LVEF ≤ 40% can also identify patients at risk of MACE and all-cause mortality from single-lead ECG recording-independent of actual LVEF on echo. This requires further evaluation as a point-of-care risk stratification tool.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCardiologyDigital HealthPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID40703135
PMCPMC12282343

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.