ArticleEwha medical journal2025
Cyclic dual latent discovery for improved blood glucose prediction through patient-provider interaction modeling: a prediction study.
Article in Ewha medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Accurate prediction of blood glucose variability is crucial for effective diabetes management, as both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, conventional predictive models rely primarily on patient-specific biometric data, often neglecting the influence of patient-provider interactions, which can significantly impact outcomes. This study introduces Cyclic Dual Latent Discovery (CDLD), a deep learning framework that explicitly models patient-provider interactions to improve prediction of blood glucose levels. By leveraging a real-world intensive care unit (ICU) dataset, the model captures latent attributes of both patients and providers, thus improving forecasting accuracy. Methods: ICU patient records were obtained from the MIMIC-IV v3.0 critical care database, including approximately 5,014 instances of patient-provider interaction. The CDLD model uses a cyclic training mechanism that alternately updates patient and provider latent representations to optimize predictive performance. During preprocessing, all numeric features were normalized, and extreme glucose values were capped at 500 mg/dL to mitigate the effect of outliers. Results: CDLD outperformed conventional models, achieving a root mean square error of 0.0852 on the validation set and 0.0899 on the test set, which indicates improved generalization. The model effectively captured latent patient-provider interaction patterns, yielding more accurate glucose variability predictions than baseline approaches. Conclusion: Integrating patient-provider interaction modeling into predictive frameworks can increase blood glucose prediction accuracy. The CDLD model offers a novel approach to diabetes management, potentially paving the way for artificial intelligence-driven personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.