ReviewPsoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Update on Erythrodermic Psoriasis: Proposal of a Management Algorithm by an Innovative Severity Evaluation Approach.
Review in Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors associated with interferon-gamma release assay positivity in patients with psoriasis: a cross-sectional study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erythrodermic psoriasis (EP) is an uncommon and severe form of psoriasis, which exhibits a Th1/Th17/TNF inflammatory pattern. Most patients with EP experience systemic symptoms that necessitate systemic treatments. These treatments include conventional systemic drugs (such as acitretin, cyclosporin A, and methotrexate), biologics (including IL-17, IL-12/23, and TNF-α inhibitors), and small molecule drugs (such as apremilast and JAK inhibitors). Evaluating the severity of EP is critical for determining appropriate treatment strategies. According to an innovative EP severity evaluation approach, patients exhibiting two or more clinical features-fever, exudation, or lymphadenopathy-are classified as having moderate-to-severe EP, while those with one or none of these symptoms are categorized as having mild EP. Mild EP can often be managed with monotherapy using acitretin, methotrexate, or biologics, such as IL-17 or IL-12/23 inhibitors, excluding TNF-α inhibitors. For moderate-to-severe EP, cyclosporine A and biologics, particularly IL-17 or IL-12/23 inhibitors, are recommended. Combination therapies are considered when monotherapies prove ineffective. These may involve combining a biologic with a conventional systemic drug or using two to three conventional systemic drugs together to enhance efficacy. Supportive care plays a critical role in alleviating the discomfort associated with skin lesions and other complications. Additionally, treatments should be tailored to address specific comorbidities, often requiring multidisciplinary collaboration. In our comprehensive review, we summarized the current evidence on therapeutic options for EP, including details on dosages, treatment durations, efficacy, and adverse events. Additionally, we incorporated new evidence on the use of acitretin, biologics, and JAK inhibitors for EP. We also introduced, for the first time, a practical management algorithm based on severity evaluation to guide the appropriate treatment of EP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.