SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Adverse events of pharmacological interventions for insomnia disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Article
- The Gut Microbiome in Sleep Disorders: A Review of Recent Evidence.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2026Review
- The Real-World Safety Profile of Temazepam: A 20-Year Pharmacovigilance Analysis Based on the Large-Scale FAERS Database.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Non-invasive electrical stimulation for sleep disturbances in adults: protocol for an evidence-mapping umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses with subgroup analysis by intervention type and population.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The clinical decision-making to insomnia drugs should comprehensively weight its risks. Objective: To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the AEs associated with different insomnia drugs for adults with insomnia. Methods: We conducted Bayesian network meta-analyses and fixed-effects Mantel-Haenszel network meta-analyses to estimate the relative safety between treatments. Results: Compared with placebo, zolpidem (somnolence: relative risk [RR] 1.85; dizziness: RR 2.33; headache: RR 1.26), zopiclone (somnolence: RR 2.02; dizziness: RR 2.33; dysgeusia: RR 7.84), indiplon (somnolence: RR 3.46; dizziness: RR 2.30; headache: RR 1.63), gaboxadol (dizziness: RR 3.44), eszopiclone (somnolence: RR 2.00; dizziness: RR 3.18; dysgeusia: RR 10.54), estazolam (somnolence: RR 2.08), flunitrazepam (somnolence: RR 3.04), flurazepam (somnolence: RR 2.52), lemborexant (somnolence: RR 6.57), nitrazepam (somnolence: RR 3.80), Ramelteon (somnolence: RR 2.19), suvorexant (somnolence: RR 3.32), Temazepam (somnolence: RR 3.77), trazodone (somnolence: RR 2.86), triazolam (somnolence: RR 2.35), and esmirtazapine (somnolence: RR 4.63; dizziness: RR 2.87) had the most harmful profile in nervous system disorders. Additionally, compared to placebo, zolpidem was also found to be associated with dry mouth (RR 1.92) and anxiety (RR 3.32); gaboxadol was associated with nausea/vomiting (RR 3.49); and eszopiclone was associated with dry mouth (RR 4.39). Doxepin was associated with lower risk of headache and somnolence than placebo or/and most of other drugs, and had also a lower rate of AEs. We observed no associations between drugs and the risks of serious AEs including nasopharyngitis, respiratory problem, accidental injury, infection, upper respiratory tract infection, sinusitis, or hematuria. Conclusions: Most drugs were positive associated with nervous system disorders and gastrointestinal disorders. Data on some drugs like flurazepam, nitrazepam, triazolam, and zaleplon in some outcomes were mainly based on limited study with rare event and thus was highly uncertain and do not allow firm conclusions. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022344981.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.