Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40704131›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of stress2025

Interhemispheric effects of iTBS on the fronto-parietal network: Evidence from dual-site stimulation.

Isabell Int-Veen, Beatrix Barth, Ramona Täglich, Betti Schopp, Hans-Christoph Nuerk, Christian Plewnia, Stefanie De Smet, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt, Andreas J Fallgatter, Ann-Christine Ehlis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of stress, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Isabell Int-VeenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Beatrix BarthDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ramona TäglichDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Betti SchoppDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Hans-Christoph NuerkDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Christian PlewniaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Stefanie De SmetDepartment of Head and Skin, Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Marie-Anne VanderhasseltDepartment of Head and Skin, Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Andreas J FallgatterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ann-Christine EhlisDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
David RosenbaumDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the neuromodulatory effects of Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) on resting-state functional connectivity (FC) following psychosocial stress induced by the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). Given its key role in cognitive control and emotion regulation - processes highly relevant for rumination - we focused on the frontoparietal network. Across two studies, intermittent (iTBS) and continuous (cTBS) protocols were applied to the left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC; study 1) and right Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC; study 2) prior to stress induction. Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to assess neural changes. A total of 88 (study 1) and 89 (study 2) healthy participants were recruited, balanced for low and high trait rumination. Each participant received both active and sham TBS (iTBS or cTBS), in a randomized, counterbalanced design. Results indicated that iTBS elicited excitatory effects on prefrontal and fronto-parietal connectivity, whereas cTBS effects were more variable. Trait rumination emerged as a modulator of TBS effects: In study 1, significant interactions for FC between the right VLPFC and Somatosensory Association Cortex (SAC) when stimulating the left DLPFC emerged, while study 2 revealed similar interactions for FC between the left DLPFC and SAC and intra-SAC FC when stimulating the right VLPFC. Correlations between post-stress state rumination and FC changes further support these findings. These results underscore the importance of neural assessments in TBS research and highlight the complexity of individual differences in state and trait rumination. Understanding the interplay between TBS, fronto-parietal connectivity, and rumination may provide valuable insights into personalized neuromodulation strategies.

Indexed as

DLPFCStressTheta Burst StimulationTrier Social Stress TestVLPFC

Identifiers

PMID40704131
PMCPMC12284565

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.