ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Sustainability diet index: a multi-criteria decision analysis proposal for culinary preparations-A case study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The environmental impact of food production and distribution has driven the need to integrate sustainability into food services. While research has traditionally focused on carbon and water footprints, other key aspects, such as local product consumption, are often overlooked. Methods: Therefore, this study proposes the development of a sustainability diet index to address these gaps, using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Specifically, the analytical hierarchy process prioritizes sustainability criteria, and the Interactive and Multicriteria Decision Making (TODIM) method ranks them. Two sustainable diet indices are proposed to assess which offers better performance. A case study of a university canteen demonstrates the index's applicability by considering starters, main courses, desserts, and menus. Results: The results indicate that rankings based on sustainability dimensions provide a broader perspective, highlighting differences among food menus. Discussion: The index revealed that menus with local and fewer animal-based ingredients score higher in sustainability, underscoring the relevance of environmental and political factors. Future work considers incorporating other cultural traditional food, menu variations, and vegetarian and vegan options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.