Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40705133›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2025

Scikit-NeuroMSI: A Generalized Framework for Modeling Multisensory Integration.

Renato Paredes, Juan B Cabral, Peggy Seriès

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Renato ParedesDepartament of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Lima, Peru. renato.paredes@pucp.edu.pe.
Juan B CabralGrupo de Innovación y Desarrollo Tecnológico, Gerencia De Vinculación Tecnológica, Centro Espacial Teófilo Tabanera, Comisión Nacional de Actividades Espaciales (CONAE), Córdoba, Argentina.
Peggy SerièsSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multisensory integration is a fundamental neural mechanism crucial for understanding cognition. Multiple theoretical models exist to account for the computational processes underpinning this mechanism. However, there is an absence of a consolidated framework that facilitates the examination of multisensory integration across diverse experimental and computational contexts. We introduce Scikit-NeuroMSI, an accessible Python-based open-source framework designed to streamline the implementation and evaluation of computational models of multisensory integration. The capabilities of Scikit-NeuroMSI were demonstrated in enabling the implementation of multiple models of multisensory integration at different levels of analysis. Furthermore, we illustrate the utility of the software in systematically exploring the model's behavior in spatiotemporal causal inference tasks through parameter sweeps in simulations. Particularly, we conducted a comparative analysis of Bayesian and network models of multisensory integration to identify commonalities that may enable to bridge both levels of description, addressing a key research question within the field. We discuss the significance of this approach in generating computationally informed hypotheses in multisensory research. Recommendations for the improvement of this software and directions for future research using this framework are presented.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, NeurologicalSoftwareBayes TheoremHumansCausal inferenceComputational modelsComputational neuroscienceMultisensory integrationScientific software

Identifiers

PMID40705133
PMCPMC12289733

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.