ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2025
Tumor Size Does Not Affect Survival Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Resection for a Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma Without Microscopic Vascular Invasion in the Modern Era of Antiviral Therapy.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWhether tumor size affects the survival of patients undergoing liver resection (LR) for a single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without microscopic vascular invasion (MVI), i.e., pathological T1N0M0, is controversial.
methodsWe enrolled 626 patients with HCC of pathological stage T1N0M0 of the 7th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer staging who underwent LR between 2011 and 2021 at our institution. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with T1N0M0 HCC > 5.0 cm and those with T1N0M0 HCC ≤ 5.0 cm was compared using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and log-rank test both before and after propensity score matching (PSM).
resultsNinety-two (14.7%) patients had T1N0M0 HCC > 5.0 cm. The proportion of patients with cirrhosis was lower in the T1N0M0 HCC > 5.0 cm group than in the T1N0M0 HCC ≤ 5.0 cm group (16.3 vs 41.2%, p < 0.001). Five-year OS did not differ significantly between the two groups before PSM (82 vs 84%, p = 0.857) or after PSM (84 vs 94%, p = 0.678). Five-year RFS did not differ significantly between the two groups before PSM (63 vs. 66%, p = 0.778) or after PSM (65 vs. 65%, p = 0.371).
conclusionTumor size did not affect the survival outcomes of patients undergoing LR for T1N0M0 HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40705244What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.