ArticleInteractive journal of medical research2025
Factors Influencing Physicians' Referral Decision-Making for Rehabilitation Outpatient Services in the Health Care Landscape of China: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Interactive journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stratified health care systems are used globally to optimize medical resource allocation and enhance patient care experiences. Although successfully implemented in countries like the United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada, China's introduction of stratified health care in 2015 has achieved progress in disease management but still faces challenges due to the lack of a comprehensive referral evaluation system and patients' preference for higher-tier medical institutions. Objective: This study aims to investigate the factors influencing Chinese rehabilitation physicians' referral decisions for outpatient rehabilitation patients. The findings may provide empirical evidence for developing stratified rehabilitation triage tools and constructing a referral evaluation system in China. Methods: This cross-sectional study, conducted from September 2023 to January 2024, examined the patient factors (diagnosis, functional impairments, disease status, condition stability, duration of illness, and functional status measured via the Longshi Scale) impacting physicians' referral decisions for outpatient rehabilitation services in China. Data were collected through convenient stratified sampling from physicians and outpatient rehabilitation patients across 12 medical institutions in 5 cities in China. Results: A total of 131 rehabilitation physicians conducted diversion assessments for 1984 outpatient rehabilitation patients in this study. In total, 45.5% (902/1984) of outpatient rehabilitation patients were considered by physicians to be referred to rehabilitation outpatient clinics, 19% (376/1984) to primary health care institutions, 20.4% (405/1984) to secondary institutions, and 15.2% (301/1984) to tertiary institutions. Single-factor analysis indicated that age, disease, functional impairment, disease control, disease stability, and Longshi Scale results were significantly associated with physicians' decisions regarding the referral institutions for outpatient rehabilitation patients. Logistic regression analysis showed that neurological disorders (odds ratio [OR] 1.88, 95% CI 1.02-3.43; P=.04), cardiopulmonary diseases (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.07-7.93; P=.04), geriatric conditions (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23-0.68; P<.001), disease control (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.13-0.34; P<.001), and Longshi Scale results for the bedridden (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.14-0.34; P<.001), and domestic groups (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.14-0.34; P<.001) as independent factors for referrals to tertiary versus primary institutions. Orthopedic diseases (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.89-5.67; P<.001), geriatric conditions (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.33-1.87; P=.009), cognitive impairments (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.17-3.36; P=.01), multiple impairments (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.70; P=.002), and disease control (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.15-0.37; P<.001) were key factors for tertiary versus secondary referrals. Conclusions: In advancing China's rehabilitation triage in the future, gaining a deep understanding of the key factors influencing physicians' decisions and quickly establishing a referral evaluation system will facilitate the accurate diversion of outpatient rehabilitation patients, enabling them to receive convenient, high-quality, and low-cost medical services. In addition, it will assist the government in reasonably and effectively allocating medical resources, thus achieving the optimization and coordination of the health care system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.