ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2025
Parent-Child Mutual Influences on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Behaviors: Actor-Partner Analysis.
Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildhood obesity remains a significant global public health issue, with consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) recognized in scientific studies as a key contributing factor. While family influences on children's dietary behaviors and their effects on obesity risk are well-documented, the dynamics between parents and children in shaping SSB consumption remain underexplored.
objectiveDrawing on social influence theory, this study examines how parent-child perceptions and consumption intentions regarding SSBs are interrelated and the potential mediating role of attitudes. We also studied how engagement with food-related content on social media may relate to consumption intentions.
methodsWe conducted a face-to-face survey of 250 parent-child dyads (N=500) living in public housing in Singapore, a country tackling overweight in its population. Dichotomous items were used to measure cognitive perceptions and attitudes toward SSBs. Both parent and child participants self-reported their intention to consume SSBs. Based on the World Health Organization (WHO) definition of SSBs, visuals of culturally relevant drink products were used in the survey to visualize SSBs. Dyadic data analysis using the MEDYAD tool was conducted to test the actor-partner interdependence model (APIM) and examine the impact of the parent-child dyadic relationship on individuals' intention to consume sugary drinks.
resultsPearson correlation results indicated positive associations between parent and child cognitive perceptions and intentions to consume SSBs. Path analysis revealed strong actor effects with both parents' (β=.52, P<.001) and children's (β=.43, P<.001) own perceptions predicting their attitudes and subsequent intentions to consume SSBs (parent: β=.32, P<.001; child: β=.31, P<.001). Partner effects also emerged: parental perceptions influenced children's intentions (β=.20, P=.01), while children's perceptions shaped parental attitudes (β=.20, P=.02), highlighting the reciprocal nature of influence. While digital food media engagement was positively associated with consumption intentions, its effects were relatively modest and not central to the dyadic pathways.
conclusionsOur study findings highlight the reciprocal effects of both parents and children in influencing healthier behaviors and hence provide insights to aid obesity prevention efforts. By addressing the interdependent associations of parent-child dynamics, this research bridges theory and health communication practice, offering a novel framework for combating obesity through family-centered approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.