Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40705491›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2025

Two-stage estimators for spatial confounding with point-referenced data.

Nate Wiecha, Jane A Hoppin, Brian J Reich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nate WiechaDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5512-6602
Jane A HoppinDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8456-0969
Brian J ReichDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5473-120X

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES025128 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Sue Fenton · 2015 to 2026
$18.3M
Spatial Causal Inference for Wildland Fire Smoke Effects on Air Pollution and HealthR01ES031651 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI REICH, BRIAN J., YANG, SHU · 2020 to 2024
$1.2M
Assessing impact of drinking water exposure to GenX (hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid) in the Cape Fear River Basin, North CarolinaR21ES029353 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI HOPPIN, JANE · 2018 to 2019
$702k
CHHENational Science Foundation DMS2152887NIEHS NIH HHS 1R21ES029353NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES025128NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES031651NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES029353NIH HHS NIH R01ES031651-01NIH HHS R01ES031651-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health data are often spatially dependent, but standard spatial regression methods can suffer from bias and invalid inference when the independent variable is associated with spatially correlated residuals. This could occur if, for example, there is an unmeasured environmental contaminant associated with the independent and outcome variables in a spatial regression analysis. Geoadditive structural equation modeling (gSEM), in which an estimated spatial trend is removed from both the explanatory and response variables before estimating the parameters of interest, has previously been proposed as a solution but there has been little investigation of gSEM's properties with point-referenced data. We link gSEM to results on double machine learning and semiparametric regression based on two-stage procedures. We propose using these semiparametric estimators for spatial regression using Gaussian processes with Matèrn covariance to estimate the spatial trends and term this class of estimators double spatial regression (DSR). We derive regularity conditions for root-n asymptotic normality and consistency and closed-form variance estimation, and show that in simulations where standard spatial regression estimators are highly biased and have poor coverage, DSR can mitigate bias more effectively than competitors and obtain nominal coverage.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalSpatial RegressionBiasBiometryComputer SimulationConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansMachine LearningNormal Distributionbias reductiondouble machine learningGaussian processsemiparametric regression

Identifiers

PMID40705491
PMCPMC12288666

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.