ArticlePloS one2025
Medicinal effects of Ephedra foeminea aqueous extracts: Metabolomic characterization, biological evaluation, and molecular docking.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing detection of low‑abundance metabolites in proton NMR through band‑selective suppression and presaturation.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2026Article
- NMR and GC-MS based metabolic profiling, total phenolic content, antibacterial, antioxidant, anticancer and In-silico antiviral activity of Origanum ramonense plant.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ephedra foeminea Forssk. is a medicinal plant traditionally used across various cultures and recognized for its historical significance in herbal medicine. It has been used as an herbal infusion to treat multiple respiratory diseases, headaches, and nasal congestion, as well as to prevent and manage breast cancer. In order to evaluate the validity of this ancestral knowledge, we aimed to investigate hot aqueous extracts of E. foeminea branches and fruits firstly by using untargeted metabolomic analysis, characterizing the chemical profiles of hot aqueous extracts from E. foeminea branches and fruits through the use of nuclear magnetic resonance, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Subsequently, two in vitro studies were conducted to assess the anticancer and antioxidant potentials of the extracts. Antioxidant activity was evaluated using a 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl assay and a total phenolic content assay. Anticancer activity was evaluated by assessing cytotoxicity using the MTT assay on MCF-7 (human breast cancer) and HeLa (cervical cancer) cell lines. Additionally, molecular docking was performed to explore the interactions between compounds identified in E. foeminea and selected cancer-related proteins, as well as the main protease of SARS-CoV-2. The results revealed that the branch extract exhibited superior antioxidant activity compared to the fruit extract, which was associated with a higher phenolic content in the branch extract (49.5 ± 0.7 mg GAE/g). The fruit extract exhibited greater cytotoxicity against MCF-7 cells, suggesting potential anticancer activity. Molecular docking analysis identified henryoside, guajavarin, and neohancoside as the most active compounds with anticancer and antiviral properties. These findings support the traditional use of E. foeminea Forssk. and highlight its potential as a source of bioactive compounds for further research into therapeutic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.