Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40707664›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A comprehensive analysis of YOLO architectures for tomato leaf disease identification.

Leo Thomas Ramos, Angel D Sappa

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Leo Thomas RamosComputer Vision Center, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, 08193, Spain. ltramos@cvc.uab.cat.
Angel D SappaComputer Vision Center, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, 08193, Spain. sappa@ieee.org.

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550-24-1-0206Direcció General de Recerca, Generalitat de Catalunya 2021SGR01499Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral CIDIS-003-2024Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2021-128945NB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tomato leaf disease detection is critical in precision agriculture for safeguarding crop health and optimizing yields. This study compares the latest YOLO architectures, including YOLOv8, YOLOv9, YOLOv10, YOLOv11, and YOLOv12, using the Tomato-Village dataset, which contains 14,368 images across six disease classes. All models are trained under identical settings to ensure a fair evaluation based on precision, recall, mean Average Precision, training time, and inference speed. Results show that YOLOv11 consistently outperforms the other architectures, achieving the highest accuracy with competitive training times and acceptable latency. YOLOv10, YOLOv8, and YOLOv12 also deliver strong results, with YOLOv12n emerging as the most effective lightweight model for resource-constrained environments. In contrast, YOLOv9 demonstrates the weakest performance, requiring more training time and exhibiting higher latency. Overall, YOLOv11 is positioned as the most effective solution for tomato leaf disease detection, providing a strong benchmark for future advancements in agricultural technology.

Indexed as

Plant DiseasesPlant LeavesSolanum lycopersicumAgriculture monitoringDeep learningLeaf disease detectionObject detectionPlant disease detectionPrecision agricultureSmart agricultureYOLO

Identifiers

PMID40707664
PMCPMC12290086

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.