ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
uPAR and cFn as candidate protein biomarkers for identifying low response to rtPA in acute ischemic stroke.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research on stem cell therapy for brain injury: A bibliometric and visual analysis (2009-2025).IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) remains the main therapeutic for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). In clinical practice, the patients with AIS presenting low response to rtPA is commonly observed. Cognizant that the endothelial cell function is impaired in AIS, this study explored the endothelial cell-associated proteins as biomarkers that may identify low response to rtPA in AIS.
methodsSpearman's correlation test was performed to assess the relationship between urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR)/cellular fibronectin (cFn) and AIS outcomes. We defined "low response to rtPA" as the patients did not present a lower National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) than at admission and still suffered from poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale > 2) with rtPA use. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the contribution of uPAR/cFn in identifying low response to rtPA in AIS. The relationship between uPAR/cFn and rtPA was further probed in Sprague-Dawley rats with experimental stroke induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion.
resultsBoth uPAR (P < 0.001) and cFn (P = 0.001) positively correlated with AIS favorable outcomes. uPAR (AUC = 68.2%, P = 0.007) and cFn (AUC = 71.3%, P = 0.002) can identify low response to rtPA. Additionally, uPAR (P = 0.015) and cFn (P = 0.004) were independent variables that predicted low response to rtPA. At 24 h and 72 h ischemic/reperfusion, rtPA tended to decrease cFn and uPAR plasma levels.
conclusionsOur study suggests that uPAR and cFn may serve as the candidate markers for identifying low response to rtPA in AIS. Patients with a low plasma level of cFn or uPAR may present low response to rtPA and still suffer from a poor outcome with rtPA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.