ArticleCurrent topics in medicinal chemistry2026
Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking, and
Article in Current topics in medicinal chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe development of secondary brain injury following intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) involves multiple pathophysiological processes. Da-cheng-qi decoction (DCQD) has a long history of effectiveness in treating ICH and exhibits a variety of pharmacological effects. However, the phytochemicals and targets of DCQD targeting the pathophysiological processes of ICH still require further elucidation. This study aims to investigate the mechanism and key phytochemicals of DCQD in treating ICH based on the pathophysiological processes.
methodsWe used the UHPLC-MS/MS method to identify the main phytochemicals of DCQD and evaluate their pharmacological and toxicological parameters. We obtained and systematically analyzed the action targets of the main phytochemicals of DCQD and screened the targets related to ICH key pathophysiological processes and the corresponding phytochemicals. The results of molecular docking, molecular dynamic simulations, the GEO database and in vitro validation experiments confirmed the results of network pharmacology.
resultsThe 20 main phytochemicals of DCQD interact with a total of 186 targets, with 75 targets specifically associated with the treatment of ICH identified through pathophysiological processes. Among them, chrysophanol 1-glucoside, aloe emodin, emodin, hesperidin, tangeritin, rhein and physcion were recognized as the potential phytochemicals of DCQD for the treatment of ICH. Neuroinflammation is a crucial factor in the development of secondary brain injury following ICH. Further analysis results suggest that targeting ferroptosis is one of the mechanisms by which DCQD regulates the pathophysiology processes of ICH to improve ICH. In vitro cell experiment results have demonstrated the regulatory effect of naringin on TNF-α and Cox2. In addition, the phytochemicals in DCQD also contribute to enhancement of cognitive function impaired by ICH.
conclusionThis study contributes to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms behind DCQD's medicinal effects in treating ICH, offering insights into potential lead compounds for the development of anti-ICH drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40708504What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.