Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40708521›Full record

SynthesisCurrent pharmaceutical design2026

Comprehensive Meta-Analysis on the Impact of the

Tarika Naik, Henu Kumar Verma, Madhubala Mulkalwar, Dinesh Mishra, Lvks Bhaskar

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current pharmaceutical design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tarika NaikDepartment of Zoology, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, India.
Henu Kumar VermaInstitute of Lung Health and Immunity (LHI)/ Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC) Helmholtz Zentrum München, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH), Ingolstädter Landstra ße 1· D-85764 Neuherberg, Munich, Germany.
Madhubala MulkalwarDepartment of Pathology, Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, India.
Dinesh MishraDepartment of Pharmacy, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4624-3978
Lvks BhaskarDepartment of Zoology, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2977-6454

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGenetic factors play a significant role in the development of leukemia. The overexpression of MDM2 is associated with the progression of certain leukemias. This meta-analysis investigates the relationship between the MDM2 SNP 309T>G and various forms of leukemia across global populations.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted to retrieve genotyping data from twenty casecontrol studies related to MDM2 SNP 309T>G polymorphism and leukemia. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the association analysis. MetaGenyo software was utilized to conduct statistical analyses in this meta-analysis.

resultsThe findings indicate a significant association between MDM2 309 SNPT>G polymorphism and leukemia in Asian and Caucasian populations. Additionally, this polymorphism is associated with an increased risk of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML), implying that MDM2 may play a role in the pathogenesis of these specific forms of leukemia.

conclusionThis meta-analysis suggests that MDM2 may represent a susceptibility gene for leukemia risk.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseLeukemiaPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2HumansMDM2 protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2AMLCMLleukemiaMDM2 309 SNP T>Gmeta-analysisrs2279744

Identifiers

PMID40708521

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.